Should any of the glibc-pre2.1 sparc patches be sent upstream?
sparc-broken-bash
Work around the broken bash and signal handling on sparc.
Can you explain how this patch fixes what it apparently fixes? I
don't understand how patching a timezone file accomplishes that.
sparc-chown Sparc needs chown handling like i386.
This one will not be submitted because the i386 chown kluge is
universally hated by the glibc developers. I did send one based on
the powerpc chown solution used in glibc 2.1. I have yet to receive
any response to it.
sparc-sigstack
We _really_ don't want to see functions which rely on sigaltstack.
Hmm... not this one.
sparc-syscalls
Fix to `getdomainname' and other syscalls in Sparc, and remove syscalls which
are only present in SunOS or Sparc/Linux 2.1.
Should the SunOS part of this be sent upstream? The 2.1-specific
stuff is supposed to be wrapped around, and really shouldn't need to
be hidden.
sparc-ldso
Fail safe on broken getcwd in 2.0.35 kernels for now.
OK, that's not going in.
sparc-sigaction
Correct return value when no oact is given to sigaction.
This one?
--
Joel Klecker (aka Espy) <URL:http://web.espy.org/>
<URL:mailto:jk@espy.org> <URL:mailto:espy@debian.org>
Debian GNU/Linux PowerPC -- <URL:http://www.debian.org/ports/powerpc/>
Reply to: