Re: The time has come (part II) ...
--On Wed, Nov 25, 1998 10:08 pm +0100 "Eric Delaunay"
<delaunay@lix.polytechnique.fr> wrote:
> About kernel, I will release the next bootdisks with 2.0.35. Is it enough
> reliable for *all* sparc workstations, or should I switch to 2.1 ?
The only serious problems I had when I used 2.0.35 were:
Buggered signal handling (fixed in glibc?)
Miscellaneous X/VC messes (possibly partly the signal-handling problem?)
ldd segfaults (only on sun4c machines, fixed in 2.1)
Since the last breaks dpkg-shlibdeps, I'm using 2.1 ATM. But it does have
some rather serious X problems on cgsixes (?)
Jules
/----------------+-------------------------------+---------------------\
| Jelibean aka | jules@jellybean.co.uk | 6 Evelyn Rd |
| Jules aka | jules@debian.org | Richmond, Surrey |
| Julian Bean | jmlb2@hermes.cam.ac.uk | TW9 2TF *UK* |
+----------------+-------------------------------+---------------------+
| Debian GNU/Linux - "Microsoft *does* have a year 2000 problem - |
| and we're it!" (paraphrased from IRC) |
\----------------------------------------------------------------------/
Reply to: