[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Sound suport on IPC



ok I am replying again now that I am home and have another fun "issue"

On Fri, Jul 31, 1998 at 10:25:36AM -0400, Tom Dyas wrote:
> On Fri, 31 Jul 1998, Stephen J. Carpenter wrote:
> 
> > do I need any special packages or anything for sound?
> > I configd the kernel sources for a recompile...no sound options in
> > there either...
> 
> Answer Yes to the "Experimental drivers" question near the top of the
> kernel configuration.

ok...I tried...
I go into /usr/src/linux and type
make menuconfig (also tried make config and make xconfig with DISPLAY 
on another machine)...I NEVER see ANY "Experiemntal Drivers" prompt.
In fact...the number of catergories and questions looks really small
(bt wwith the SAME source set for i386 I DO get the prompt)

question: I got the source (2.0.35 from the offical tgz..and 2.0.34 from
the debian source package...tried both) I edited the toplevel Makefile and 
changed ARCH from i386 to sparc.

HWen I do this I get a menuconfig with some sparc specific questions but
it is missing all of thes ethings you mention.
am I doing something wrong? do I need to do more than just edit
the toplevel makefile?

hmm maybe I will try rolling back to a pre-34 kernel...maybe 2.0.29 (I have it 
on hand) or 33 (thats what I have it running now I think)

-Steve
> Then answer Y or M to the SparcAudio driver and then Y or M to the AMD7930
> driver which is used in the sun4c.
> 
> The audio questions should come after the frame buffer questions.
> 
> For more information, look in arch/sparc/config.in for the call to "source
> drivers/sbus/audio/Config.in".
> 
> Tom
> 
> 
> 
> --  
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-sparc-request@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
> 
> 

-- 
** Stephen Carpenter ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** sjc@delphi.com **
"All authority is quite degrading."
-- Oscar Wilde

Attachment: pgpvj_r6ZFXhU.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: