Re: kernel-patch*sparc* and libc-sparc
James Troup wrote:
> [ Just looking at some ftp.debian.org problems in relation to Quinn
> Diff, and these are the sparc-related areas ]
> a) Why is kernel-patch*sparc* Architecture: sparc and not
> Architecture: all? You don't need a sparc to install it and cross
> compile a sparc kernel (I assume). m68k's kernel-patch is Arch:
> all, and I use it on an i386 machine to cross compile the m68k
> kernel images.
Ok, I will change it at kernel next upload.
> b) Is there a binary package produced from the libc-sparc source
> package (in oldlibs)? I can't see one looking at
> hamm/hamm/binary-sparc/Packages. If not, I'll ask Guy to remove
> the source package.
The debian rules is a bit out of date regarding policy number. Maybe
it does not put a source: line in the changes file.
Do you think I should upload a new release as soon as possible just to fix
this problem ? (I'm afraid I don't have lot of time to work on it now as I'm
already working on building new boot disks for sparc).
Eric Delaunay | "La guerre justifie l'existence des militaires.
email@example.com | En les supprimant." Henri Jeanson (1900-1970)
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to firstname.lastname@example.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact email@example.com