Re: Freeze of Hamm in other architectures

To: Michael Alan Dorman <mdorman@law.miami.edu>
Cc: Brian White <bcwhite@verisim.com>, debian-powerpc@lists.debian.org, debian-alpha@lists.debian.org, debian-sparc@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Freeze of Hamm in other architectures
From: Guenter Geiger <geiger@iem.mhsg.ac.at>
Date: Sat, 4 Apr 1998 14:58:07 -0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 199804041558.OAA13179@webern.mhsg.ac.at>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] ylfjn2e2fvg6.fsf@law.miami.edu>
References: <[🔎] 35253ED5.15D2909A@verisim.com> <[🔎] ylfjn2e2fvg6.fsf@law.miami.edu>

Michael Alan Dorman writes:
 > 
 > Alpha is stable, but not feature-complete.
 > 
 > I could be convinced either way.
 > 
 > Mike.
 > 

 Yes, true, but I doubt that Redhat is "feature complete". 
 Work that needs to be done on alpha for a release is for the base
 disks, Documentation for base disks, and
 testing ...

 Guenter

--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-sparc-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

Reply to:

References:
- Freeze of Hamm in other architectures
  - From: Brian White <bcwhite@verisim.com>
- Re: Freeze of Hamm in other architectures
  - From: Michael Alan Dorman <mdorman@law.miami.edu>

Prev by Date: Re: Freeze of Hamm in other architectures
Next by Date: Problem with compiling INN under DebianSparc
Previous by thread: Re: Freeze of Hamm in other architectures
Next by thread: Re: Freeze of Hamm in other architectures
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread