Re: libc6 status
Juan Cespedes wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 09, 1998 at 02:41:45PM +0100, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
> >
> > Don't make your life too difficult. Just apply the following patch
> > which should be in the next glibc snapshot.
> > Index: libc.map
> > ===================================================================
> > RCS file: /egcs/carton/cvsfiles/libc/libc.map,v
> > retrieving revision 1.38
> > diff -u -r1.38 libc.map
> > --- libc.map 1998/02/01 16:18:18 1.38
> > +++ libc.map 1998/02/09 07:52:01
> > @@ -20,6 +20,9 @@
> > # This is for ix86 only.
> > _fp_hw;
> >
> > + # This is for sparc only.
> > + .div; .mul; .rem; .udiv; .umul; .urem;
> > +
>
> Sorry, but that wouldn't work. Current binutils don't work
> if you include symbols beginning with `.' in the libc.map. This is
> (IMHO) a bug in binutils... I'm CC'ing H.J. Lu.
I guess I did it last year (at the time I maintained the glibc-sparc) by
quoting the names:
".div"; ".mul"; ".rem"; ".udiv"; ".umul"; ".urem";
Did you tried that?
PS: binutils was 2.8.1.0.?? (15 ?)
--
Eric Delaunay | "La guerre justifie l'existence des militaires.
delaunay@lix.polytechnique.fr | En les supprimant." Henri Jeanson (1900-1970)
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-sparc-request@lists.debian.org .
Trouble? e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .
Reply to: