Bug#651732: adolc: Contains non-free Windows executables
- To: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
- Cc: 651732@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Bug#651732: adolc: Contains non-free Windows executables
- From: Peter Palfrader <weasel@debian.org>
- Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 13:23:53 +0100
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20120124122353.GN13818@anguilla.noreply.org>
- Reply-to: Peter Palfrader <weasel@debian.org>, 651732@bugs.debian.org
- In-reply-to: <20120124105903.GA2023@burratino>
- References: <20110913195816.1315.23933.reportbug@localhost> <E1R3aKB-0006j8-CM@port-kdr.hamilton.local> <4E722883.2060204@elmundolibre.be> <E1R4FHY-0000qh-SA@port-kdr.hamilton.local> <4E777AD3.8070501@elmundolibre.be> <20111110080535.GA26556@elie.hsd1.il.comcast.net> <20111211184913.GA23173@elie.hsd1.il.comcast.net> <20120124102947.GL13818@anguilla.noreply.org> <20120124105903.GA2023@burratino>
On Die, 24 Jän 2012, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Peter Palfrader wrote:
>
> > Seems that fell a bit through the cracks. Done now. It seems that
> > 2.1.10 and 2.1.12 were also affected.
> >
> > I removed the orig.tar.gz and the binaries build from the source but
> > left the .dsc and diff.gz/debian.tar.gz in place since I assume they are
> > fine.
>
> Yep, makes sense. Thanks for your work.
>
> > removal log entry: http://snapshot.debian.org/removal/29
>
> Hmm, shouldn't version 2.1.8+nomsvcrt be safe to keep?
You tell me.
--
| .''`. ** Debian **
Peter Palfrader | : :' : The universal
http://www.palfrader.org/ | `. `' Operating System
| `- http://www.debian.org/
Reply to: