[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#581154: marked as done (snapshot.debian.org: please remove vegastrike <= 0.4.3.debian1-1)



Your message dated Thu, 13 May 2010 14:36:42 +0200
with message-id <20100513123642.GH8909@anguilla.noreply.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#581154: snapshot.debian.org: please remove vegastrike <= 0.4.3.debian1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #581154,
regarding snapshot.debian.org: please remove vegastrike <= 0.4.3.debian1-1
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
581154: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=581154
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: snapshot.debian.org
Severity: normal

  Please remove old versions of vegastrike, they contain a source file
with two conflicting licenses, hence not redistributable, see:

http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=449475

  Many thanks,

      Vincent


-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-3-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Thu, 13 May 2010, Vincent Fourmond wrote:

> On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 11:00 PM, Peter Palfrader <weasel@debian.org> wrote:
> > On Tue, 11 May 2010, Vincent Fourmond wrote:
> >
> >> Package: snapshot.debian.org
> >> Severity: normal
> >>
> >>   Please remove old versions of vegastrike, they contain a source file
> >> with two conflicting licenses, hence not redistributable, see:
> >>
> >> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=449475
> >
> > I completely agree that all the binaries should be removed.
> >
> > However, from a quick glance at the bug report it suggests that while
> > the source code license is non-free it might be ok to redistribute.  Is
> > this impression correct or do we need to get rid of the source as well?
> 
>   Unfortunately not: the source file in question is distributed both
> under the GPL and under a non-commercial license *at the same time*
> (it's not up to you to chose, you have to comply with both). So it is
> not usable/distributable.

Thanks for the explanation.

Too bad.  I've removed vegastrike <= 0.4.3.debian1-1 on snapshot-master.
Should take effect on the mirror in a couple of hours.

http://snapshot-master.debian.org/removal/21

Cheers,
-- 
                           |  .''`.  ** Debian GNU/Linux **
      Peter Palfrader      | : :' :      The  universal
 http://www.palfrader.org/ | `. `'      Operating System
                           |   `-    http://www.debian.org/


--- End Message ---

Reply to: