> The packages are in good shape and mostly up-to-date, and only some of them > have outstanding bug reports filed against them. Just in looking at xmltv's dependencies and build dependencies, I have a direct interest in these packages: libxml-simple-perl libxml-twig-perl libxml-writer-perl If I look a little further down the line, I guess I have an indirect interest in these, too: libxml-libxml-common-perl libxml-libxml-perl libxml-namespacesupport-perl libxml-sax-expat-perl libxml-sax-perl I'm already backporting libxml-twig-perl, so I could take it without a lot of effort. I'd rather not take the rest (I'm swamped as it is) but I would if no one else steps in. Can you give me an idea how much time you've needed to spend on these eight packages in the last few months? Have I picked any of the ones that are giving you headaches? (I've already noticed your most recent updates to a lot of these packages, which I assume you've been doing in preparation to put them up for adoption.) Thanks, KEN -- Kenneth J. Pronovici <pronovic@debian.org>
Attachment:
pgpzqBL5V5kJp.pgp
Description: PGP signature