Re: docbook-website package status?
Yeah, It's a great package. And you're right, the bugs are easy to
fix.
I'll try to upload the new 2.2 version (with xml catalogs) today or
tomorrow. I've set aside the entire week for my debian stuff. Really.
Mark
On , May 27, Adam Di Carlo wrote:
>
> Mark, I notice a lot of old old old easy to fix bugs in the DocBook
> website package.
>
> I'm starting to use this package and the bugs, especially the lack of
> the latest upstream version, is cramping my ability to get work done.
> Would you welcome an NMU that fixes all open bugs? Would you prefer a
> patch (although providing a patch for the new upstream version is
> kinda awkward).
>
> Let me know. I wish I could volunteer to help you co-maintain that
> package. Maybe that is possible down the road for me, but right now
> I'm just trying to struggle to the top of my pile of things to do...
>
> --
> ...Adam Di Carlo..<adam@onshore-devel.com>...<URL:http://www.onshored.com/>
>
--
_____________________________________
Mark Johnson <mark@duke.edu>
Debian SGML <mrj@debian.org>
Home Page: <http://dulug.duke.edu/~mark/>
GPG fp: 50DF A22D 5119 3485 E9E4 89B2 BCBC B2C8 2BE2 FE81
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-sgml-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: