Re: weird docbook xml doctype issue

[Mark Johnson <mark@phy.duke.edu>]

Joey Hess writes:
> [ I'd appreciate cc's, I didn't think I'm on this list. ]
> 
> I used to be able to use:
> 
> <!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//Norman Walsh//DTD DocBk XML V3.1//EN"
>      "dtd/docbook-xml/docbookx.dtd" [
> 
> And jade would find the docbook-xml dtd. Now it seems I need:
> 
> <!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//Norman Walsh//DTD DocBk XML V3.1.7//EN"
>      "dtd/docbook-xml/3.1.7/docbookx.dtd" [
> 

Joey,


I tested it on my woody system and didn't have a problem either.

Which version of docbook-xml are you using? 

I ask because V3.1.7.1 (in stable) has a broken catalog file and
shouldn't be used.

If you upgrade to V4.1.2 this problem will go away -- but you'll also
have to upgrade your docbook sgml package (aka docbook_4.1-0.1.deb).

But if you don't want to deal with upgrades, lemme know. I'll give you a
fixed version of the old V3.1.7.1 package.

On the other hand, if you're having this problem with V4 stuff it is a
mystery. Yep, your catalog file would indeed be helpful.

Mark

> I can't figure out what broke this, all the relevant packages (in
> unstable) don't seem to have changed in a while. What gives?
> 
> -- 
> see shy jo
> 
> 
> --  
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-sgml-request@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org