Making contact point obvious (Was: Broken links on […])
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
> On Monday 19 September 2011 14:50:45 David Prévot wrote:
>> Hi Henri, thanks for your report, forwarding it to Nico who is taking
>> care of this service according to the DNS entry [0], to the brand new
>> debian-services-admin mailing list (is it OK to forward such bugs report
>> here?) […]
Le 19/09/2011 17:19, Enrico Zini a écrit :
> I'd say that if you know who's looking after the service, you don't
> need to keep debian-services-admin@lists.debian.org in the loop.
>
> If instead you don't know who's looking after the service, or how to
> deal with it, then debian-services-admin@lists.debian.org would be the
> place to ask.
Le 19/09/2011 18:28, Raphael Geissert a écrit :
> Alternatively, looking at the main page you have a full section titled
> "Contacting the team."
Indeed, thanks, I missed it (so did the initial reporter who filled a
bug against the www.debian.org pseudopackage). While forwarding another
issue against the backport service, my mail to the backport mailinglist
was even lost (since I didn't directly contact the backport *team*).
Even if the service census [0] will soon be a good place to find an
accurate contact point to forward issues misreported, I do believe that
an obvious contact point available at the bottom of every page of each
service would be an improvement (either a mail contact as in
http://{bugs,packages,patch-tracker,www}.debian.org/<any page> or a way
to report issue, e.g. using the BTS as in http://snapshot.debian.org/).
0 : http://wiki.debian.org/Services
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)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=XbWW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: