[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Have I caught a firmware attack in the act? Or am I just paranoid?



On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 3:30 PM Rebecca N. Palmer wrote:

> but at least some USB flash drives instead use an SCSI command [1],
> which usbguard won't catch.

This seems like a significant missing feature, but I guess it would
require a fair bit of Linux kernel work to support filtering such
commands.

> I'm also not sure whether firmware-based malware is common enough to be
> something the average developer should worry about.

IMO proprietary software is worrisome in any context and the Linux
kernel definitely needs hardening against malicious devices. There has
been some recent work on exploiting radio firmware and then exploiting
Linux from there, here are two examples that come to mind:

https://googleprojectzero.blogspot.com/2017/04/over-air-exploiting-broadcoms-wi-fi_4.html
https://googleprojectzero.blogspot.com/2017/04/over-air-exploiting-broadcoms-wi-fi_11.html
https://blade.tencent.com/en/advisories/qualpwn/

> Aug  5 07:21:51 rnpalmer-laptop kernel: [34901.758084] usb 3-2.1:
> SerialNumber: F32402A6

This got deleted.

> Aug  6 21:52:26 rnpalmer-laptop kernel: [50370.579113] usb 3-2.1: New
> USB device found, idVendor=058f, idProduct=1234

This vendor/product combo is known to usb.ids:

/usr/share/misc/usb.ids:058f  Alcor Micro Corp.
/usr/share/misc/usb.ids:    1234  Flash Drive
...
/usr/share/misc/usb.ids:    6387  Flash Drive
...
/usr/share/misc/usb.ids:    9380  Flash Drive
/usr/share/misc/usb.ids:    9381  Flash Drive
/usr/share/misc/usb.ids:    9382  Acer/Sweex Flash drive

> Aug  6 21:52:26 rnpalmer-laptop kernel: [50370.579117] usb 3-2.1: New
> USB device strings: Mfr=1, Product=2, SerialNumber=0

The serial number went to zero.

> Aug  6 21:52:26 rnpalmer-laptop kernel: [50370.579121] usb 3-2.1:
> Manufacturer: Alcor Micro

This changed from "Generic" and idVendor=058f is Alcor Micro.

Based on the serial number deletion, I'd speculate that some internal
part of the flash holding details about the device identity
malfunctioned, so the firmware reverted back to the default hardcoded
product id for Alcor flash drives. No idea if this is a reasonable
theory or what caused the malfunction, malware or otherwise.

-- 
bye,
pabs

https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise


Reply to: