[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [SECURITY] [DSA 3448-1] linux security update



So you are saying there is no one there smart enough to know how their software works to remove me? all my other mails get sent back with errors, so obviously you are wrong.

someone take my email off the list or I will report it as harassment.


On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 3:06 PM, Povl Ole Haarlev Olsen <debian-security@stderr.dk> wrote:
On Tue, 19 Jan 2016, James Barrett wrote:
It has been requested that the following address:

       xucaen@gmail.com

should be deleted from the debian-security mailing list.

Sorry, but this address has NOT been found on the list.

That makes sense. You're trying to unsubscribe from the "debian-security" mailing list, not the "debian-security-ANNOUNCE" mailing list. Different mailing lists. You need to send your unsubscribe request to the correct address.

Please check carefully the spelling of this address.
You may send an unsubscribe request with another address.
If the address is on the list you will receive a confirmation
message. A reply to this message will remove the address.

It follows a copy of your unsubscribe request

>From xucaen@gmail.com  Tue Jan 19 19:02:00 2016
>Return-Path: <xucaen@gmail.com>
>X-Original-To: lists-debian-security-request@bendel.debian.org
>Delivered-To: lists-debian-security-request@bendel.debian.org
>Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
>       by bendel.debian.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E955B1B0
>       for <lists-debian-security-request@bendel.debian.org>; Tue, 19 Jan
2016 19:02:00 +0000 (UTC)
>X-Virus-Scanned: at lists.debian.org with policy bank request
>X-Spam-Flag: NO
>X-Spam-Score: 2.202
>X-Spam-Level: **
>X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.202 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3
>       tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
>       DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=2,
>       LDO_WHITELIST=-5, _ONEWORD_=2, _ONEWORDALL_=4, _ONEWORDBODY_=2,
>       RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, TVD_SPACE_RATIO=0.001]
>       autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
>Received: from bendel.debian.org ([127.0.0.1])
>       by localhost (lists.debian.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 2525)
>       with ESMTP id aVfmIcUDtuvc
>       for <lists-debian-security-request@bendel.debian.org>;
>       Tue, 19 Jan 2016 19:01:56 +0000 (UTC)
>X-policyd-weight:  NOT_IN_SBL_XBL_SPAMHAUS=-1.5 NOT_IN_BL_NJABL=-1.5
CL_IP_EQ_HELO_IP=-2 (check from: .gmail. - helo: .mail-ig0-x234.google. -
helo-domain: .google.)  FROM/MX_MATCHES_HELO(DOMAIN)=-2; rate: -7
>Received: from mail-ig0-x234.google.com (mail-ig0-x234.google.com
[IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::234])
>       (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128
bits))
>       (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2"
(not verified))
>       by bendel.debian.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FEC0160
>       for <debian-security-request@lists.debian.org>; Tue, 19 Jan 2016
19:01:55 +0000 (UTC)
>Received: by mail-ig0-x234.google.com with SMTP id mw1so74135302igb.1
>        for <debian-security-request@lists.debian.org>; Tue, 19 Jan 2016
11:01:55 -0800 (PST)
>DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
>        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
>        h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
>        bh=Vxkp8yZr4P8V6TzTleHZpzCcV9/B/xWQu0t2h/PE0lw=;
>       
b=gcV/A4o9xD7DskikOnOySfUQctBVPu6x44FwD5+/oeHllLoUf9cQGcVpUn6eJW5f+L
>       
 V+8/RSE5mGBLR6UaKnucOb4NYWY+97qYbRLy00j/DVjnA9mn3tOTWAkVPBDTp8xKLvis
>       
 cX/Bq985R+J07C2rLfSe4GMSatf0WbVgE458zmFcD6yR/OMqLqV+PlNS8DzC9xdjG25a
>       
 DgA0liape8MY+O5CTXdNMLVVc3opxv71NRtvctfeGSLggDVwwi8x7+PDrKc+pOVZX6e2
>       
 BgGcCVNDd+NlefN/NZHR+qRDTd07JR3nghgbyhspTr5krGonLA47FoTYFfj0u0QFEORY
>         syXQ==
>X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
>        d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
>        h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to
>         :content-type;
>        bh=Vxkp8yZr4P8V6TzTleHZpzCcV9/B/xWQu0t2h/PE0lw=;
>       
b=dTsV7jV3xCPbABdx3CumvamvoRObLLl4fUHvSaQA/5dW+yt889YhpHSskHNUnjD4q4
>       
 1OS88R5NPHe35J7asmaAFq8ACEmmtoQ+tb4seYHeCcS0NxYvQMPib/Bvacm3oxndyeFW
>       
 nnfyQJXYUOaghxBm583ziOaF2NWDkkv4iNVpE/uLRrBqH1CVBdE7z+h1GxsAAr4IrHr5
>       
 2ud5Qtfz+ZsFBNolDOs8Di1MyQGLWa1Iv2EZJgJ7MFFhDewWRr9ombcai+VSUycC0aEa
>       
 mu1GxshJfIRbQYEGrn+ieAJN87surexWb5jdm1JJCRKYyko8VXiEZuy/9rsvJXyeNJ17
>         5CgQ==
>X-Gm-Message-State:AG10YOS+CFl0ml8uf1yZaRKNYw9kOr9eDdKZWwpaqAp4BlGi2lPT/qB7f3KL1Q9wkwIDrTrc1TM
k9Oh55D482A==
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>X-Received: by 10.50.136.136 with SMTP id qa8mr7111321igb.39.1453230112707;
> Tue, 19 Jan 2016 11:01:52 -0800 (PST)
>Received: by 10.36.204.65 with HTTP; Tue, 19 Jan 2016 11:01:52 -0800 (PST)
>Received: by 10.36.204.65 with HTTP; Tue, 19 Jan 2016 11:01:52 -0800 (PST)
>Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2016 14:01:52 -0500
>Message-ID:
<CAG9FBFo4_85Vk8eiFEak1p2MiwmZJTksk2YaZYMHL-Rv_yDU8g@mail.gmail.com>
>Subject: Unsubscribe
>From: James Barrett <xucaen@gmail.com>
>To: debian-security-request@lists.debian.org
>Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e01536f8ca521790529b480c7
>X-Rc-Virus: 2007-09-13_01
>X-Rc-Spam: 2008-11-04_01
>
>--089e01536f8ca521790529b480c7
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>
>Unsubscribe
>
>--089e01536f8ca521790529b480c7
>Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
>
><p dir="ltr">Unsubscribe</p>
>
>--089e01536f8ca521790529b480c7--
>

On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 2:58 PM, Povl Ole Haarlev Olsen
<debian-security@stderr.dk> wrote:
      On Tue, 19 Jan 2016, James Barrett wrote:
            Please stop sending me these emails.


      If you want to unsubscribe from the debian-security-announce
      mailinglist, you should check the mail headers. They'll tell you
      what to do.

      Your message was sent to another mailinglist, the
      debian-security list (without the "announce" part). That
      mailinglist is a bit more high volume and there's a risk your
      mail won't be seen by anyone from Debian. In other words:
      Unsubscribe yourself. Don't count on others.

      --
      Povl Ole





--
Povl Ole


Reply to: