Re: jedit_4.3.1+dfsg-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
- To: security@debian.org, Debian Security <debian-security@lists.debian.org>
- Cc: Michael Tautschnig <mt@debian.org>, Torsten Werner <twerner@debian.org>, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl <tolimar@debian.org>
- Subject: Re: jedit_4.3.1+dfsg-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
- From: Gabriele Giacone <1o5g4r8o@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 01 Apr 2010 00:30:52 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] 4BB3CD1C.8000005@gmail.com>
- In-reply-to: <20100318142739.GA32085@laptop165.dbai.tuwien.ac.at>
- References: <E1NrvsW-0000zv-Uu@ries.debian.org> <4BA10EEA.6080803@gmail.com> <4BA1DE7B.20404@debian.org> <82b06fd61003180322i5a9cec6q714358f43461d5e@mail.gmail.com> <4BA22E19.2090107@debian.org> <82b06fd61003180719x158afd6ej38d80d1a2645888c@mail.gmail.com> <20100318142739.GA32085@laptop165.dbai.tuwien.ac.at>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
[ CC-ing d-security could give more feedbacks ]
Hello,
a little summary:
I'm packaging jedit which uses a modified version of bsh (already in
Debian and team maintained). Building jedit against current Debian bsh
is not possible and uploading a new Debian bsh with jedit changes is not
a good idea because changes are only needed by jedit.
I looked for Debian binary packages which contain sources and I found
the following ones (maybe other exist)
mush-src (non-free, AFAIU binary redistribution not permitted)
qmail-src (non-free, AFAIU binary redistribution not permitted)
maxima-src
erlang-src
openjdk-6-source
sun-java6-source
For example openjdk-6-source: source code is in both orig tarball and
openjdk-6-source binary package. This is a duplication, isn't it?
Regarding jedit, what about adding the creation of bsh-src binary
package, adding bsh-src to jedit's Build-Depends and applying jedit
patch at build time?
To take a look to the current jedit package which includes Debian bsh
tarball and applies jedit patch:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/j/jedit/jedit_4.3.1+dfsg-1.dsc
Thread on d-java: <4B858F27.9030108@gmail.com>
Thanks for your attention.
Gabriele
On 03/18/2010 03:27 PM, Michael Tautschnig wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 2:43 PM, Torsten Werner <twerner@debian.org> wrote:
>>> Hi Gabriele,
>>>
>> Hi Torsten,
>>
>>> Gabriele Giacone schrieb:
>>>> But in order not to duplicate code, in which way could I get bsh sources?
>>>
>>> embedding our own copy bsh into jedit is duplication. Do we have a
>>> chance to avoid embedding bsh?
>> The ideal would be getting bsh _sources_ at build time treating them
>> as Build-Depends. Is it possible? Similar cases in the past?
>>
>
> [...]
>
> jedit requires modified bsh sources; could these changes be included in standard
> bsh and jedit just use bsh jars, or do these patches break standard bsh?
>
> Best,
> Michael
>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAkuzzRYACgkQp3cdCbVcnCvPbQCfehG1i9F5A2kJOAANqlSfqTpV
uaQAn1f1wceyJExU6Cy6XOunVuj0ENmz
=awyR
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: