Re: [SECURITY] [DSA 1605-1] DNS vulnerability impact on the libc stub resolver

[Mert Dirik <mertdirik@gmail.com>]

Florian Weimer yazmış:
> * Josip Rodin:
> 
>> Why is this phrased in a way that it prefers BIND as a recursive resolver,
>> when that same software was *only just* patched to be acceptable for the
>> same purpose?
> 
> PowerDNS is not available on all architectures, and Unbound and tinydns
> are not part of etch.
> 
> So it's lack of alternatives, more or less.
> 

I don't really know much about these things but can't maradns or dnsmasq be used
with same purpose?