On Monday 25 August 2008 05:56, Charles Plessy wrote: > I have not followed the discussions on -devel closely. What is the > relevance of this bug for the releasability of the package? Upstream is > already at a much higher version number and I am not able to solve the > prolem by myself. > > Since the vulnerabiilty can only be exploited by other local users, and > since mafft is a scientific software either used on personnal computers > or on scientific workstations in trusted environments, can I ignore the > bug for Lenny and work with Upsteam on a fix in the latest release? FTR: I've just added a comment to the bug log why I don't think that is appropriate. Thijs
Attachment:
pgpnZ5ORgRaGO.pgp
Description: PGP signature