On Fri, 14 Dec 2007 12:13:12 pm Nicolas Boullis wrote: > Hi, > > Steffen Joeris wrote: > >>Note from what I can see, the sarge packages (except the i386 version) > >> did not depend on 238-1, but the etch packages do. > >>cc'ing the maintainer, maybe he knows why. > > > > I meant that the sarge packages did not depend on libkrb53 of course. > > Thanks for your answer. I'd guess the problem might be related to a > missing build-dependency, don't you think so? Either that or the build-dependency should only be for etch and later. Let's see, what the maintainer says. Cheers Steffen
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.