Re: avahi-daemon
On Fri, Mar 03, 2006, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 03, 2006 at 02:36:38PM +0100, Loïc Minier wrote:
> > This is a desktop machine, it should permit sharing of files on your
> > local network. DNS servers have their port 53 open to respond to name
> > resolution queries, just consider your desktop installation to be a
> > name server responding to stuff such as "what services are available",
> > "what shares are available" etc.
>
> /me looks doumbfounded
>
> Excuse me? Since when does a typical desktop machine provide users to share
> *music* on a local network? (Don't tergiverse the fact that ahdavi is used,
> in rythmbox, to share music, not files)
I said sharing of files, and I meant files only, as in sharing of data
files between coworkers with samba for example.
> And for the same thing, why would a typical desktop machine provide users
> to share even files! My desktop system at home (and my parent's and my
> uncle's and whatnot) are completely stand-alone desktop systems, connected to
> the Internet, with no LAN. They only need to talk to their (serial or USB
> connected) printer, that's all!
Fine, and perhaps you don't even need music sharing on them, but does it
still automounts filesystems plugged in USB? :)
One can't know in advance what uses a system is for, I believe people
installing Rhythmbox want to be able to share music by default
(easily). You're free to believe the contrary, it's a matter of
opinion, I gave numerous arguments to my position already, and don't
want to talk in loops any further. You don't want it? Don't install
it or configure it the way you like.
> I'm surprised that the over-bloat of Windows' desktop is now considered to be
> the good way of doing things.
I'd rather have drawn a parallel with Apple software, such as MacOSX,
or their Wifi APs. Please have a look at their traffic and open ports
next time you get near one of them.
Bye,
--
Loïc Minier <lool@dooz.org>
Reply to: