Re: WG: critical bug in cacti

To: "Gunther Stammwitz" <gstammw@gmx.net>
Cc: <debian-security@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: WG: critical bug in cacti
From: Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2005 18:07:23 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 87r7e1s75w.fsf@deneb.enyo.de>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20050714132611.4B9DA170029@server.edu-search.de> (Gunther Stammwitz's message of "Thu, 14 Jul 2005 15:26:45 +0200")
References: <[🔎] 20050714132611.4B9DA170029@server.edu-search.de>

* Gunther Stammwitz:

> No answer yet... Does anyone know what's going on at the security
> team?

You should report publicly documented security issues to the Bug
Tracking System (with a "security" tag), and not directly to the
security team.  The BTS is read by more people, and the actual package
maintainer can comment.  From the BTS, you can see that there's
already ongoing work on a security update:

  http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=315703
  http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=316590

Reply to:

References:
- WG: critical bug in cacti
  - From: "Gunther Stammwitz" <gstammw@gmx.net>

Prev by Date: Re: Timeliness of Debian Security Announceness? (DSA 756-1 Squirrelmail)
Next by Date: Re: Timeliness of Debian Security Announceness? (DSA 756-1 Squirrelmail)
Previous by thread: WG: critical bug in cacti
Next by thread: Timeliness of Debian Security Announceness? (DSA 756-1 Squirrelmail)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread