[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Compromised system - still ok? - doorstep

hi ya

On Mon, 7 Feb 2005, James Renken wrote:


> The summary in legal terms: contributory negligence is not a defense to an
> intentional (or reckless) tort.  The first major case I found with an
> offhand search is:
> Schellhouse v. Norfolk & W. Ry. Co., 575 N.E.2d 453, 456 (Ohio 1991)

> Hope this helps. :) The largest problem, I think, would be identifying the
> intruder with enough certainty to sue them.

it'd be fun to have the cops show up on the cracker's doorstep
while they're in the cracked servers along the way at the time
and the victim's servers
	- makes it a whole lot easier

c ya

Reply to: