On Mon, Sep 27, 2004 at 01:27:46PM +0100, Steve Kemp wrote: >On Sun, Sep 26, 2004 at 03:46:44PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote: > >> > CVE Name: CAN-2004-0414, CAN-2004-0416, CAN-2004-0417, CAN-2004-0418, >> > CAN-2004-0778 > > CAN-2004-0416, CAN-2004-0417, and CAN-2004-0418 were fixed in DSA-519. > > CAN-2004-0414 was fixed in DSA-517. > > So it looks like only 418, and 0778 aren't addressed, these may or > may not be severe. I notice that DSA-505 fixed CAN-2004-0396, for what > that's worth.. No, just 0778. I must admit that I'd lost track of that one - see #266721. Unfortunately (see my post to -private), I'm unable to do anything about it for the next few days. An NMU for that would be welcome, otherwise I expect to pick it up at the weekend. -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK. steve@einval.com "Further comment on how I feel about IBM will appear once I've worked out whether they're being malicious or incompetent. Capital letters are forecast." Matthew Garrett, http://www.livejournal.com/users/mjg59/30675.html
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature