Re: Security patches
On Mon, 1 Dec 2003 07:46, Andreas Barth <aba@not.so.argh.org> wrote:
> * Russell Coker (russell@coker.com.au) [031130 21:40]:
> > On Mon, 1 Dec 2003 05:10, "Milan P. Stanic" <mps@rns-nis.co.yu> wrote:
> > > On Sun, Nov 30, 2003 at 11:24:43PM +1100, Russell Coker wrote:
> > > > It's a pity that the developers of other security systems didn't get
> > > > involved, it would be good to have a choice of LIDS, HP's system,
> > > > DTE, and others in the standard kernel.
> > >
> > > LIDS uses LSM in 2.5/2.6 kernel series, IIRC.
> >
> > LIDS does not appear to be in 2.6 at all.
>
> It seems that there are at least patches for 2.6, see
> http://www.lids.org/ (or http://lsm.immunix.org/lsm_modules.html )
The Immunix site is way out of date, they don't have a 2.4.x patch later than
2.4.20 or a 2.5 patch later than 2.5.72 in the download section (and no
support for 2.6.x at all).
As for having patches for 2.6, it would be more convenient for everyone if
they would submit them to Linus.
--
http://www.coker.com.au/selinux/ My NSA Security Enhanced Linux packages
http://www.coker.com.au/bonnie++/ Bonnie++ hard drive benchmark
http://www.coker.com.au/postal/ Postal SMTP/POP benchmark
http://www.coker.com.au/~russell/ My home page
Reply to: