Re: Can this be considered a DoS-attack?

To: Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn <cristian.ionescu-idbohrn@axis.com>, debian-security@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Can this be considered a DoS-attack?
From: Daniel O'Neill <doneill@thelodgingco.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2003 18:51:09 +0000
Message-id: <[🔎] 20030108185109.1a509b7e.doneill@thelodgingco.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 0301081907120.0@somehost.domain.com>
References: <[🔎] 0301080051520.0@somehost.domain.com> <[🔎] 0301081907120.0@somehost.domain.com>

No, and it seems they've fixed their problem on their end.

I think it hurt them a lot worse (on bandwidth) than it hurt you :)

On Wed, 8 Jan 2003 19:21:45 +0100 (CET)
Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn <cristian.ionescu-idbohrn@axis.com> wrote:

> http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/magazine/technical/linux.html

Attachment: pgpow7Z3YifPX.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to:

References:
- Re: Updated OPENSSL package for Debian?
  - From: Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn <cristian.ionescu-idbohrn@axis.com>
- Can this be considered a DoS-attack?
  - From: Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn <cristian.ionescu-idbohrn@axis.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Can this be considered a DoS-attack?
Next by Date: Gnutella? (was Re: TCP port 6352?)
Previous by thread: Re: Can this be considered a DoS-attack?
Next by thread: ssh and lastlog
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread