Re: AW: export problems on security updates?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Actually, I was not trying to make any specific statement about
non-US cryptography law - I have no details on any specifics. I was
just making a generalized statement that local law should apply
rather than US law.
BTW, What ever happened to the EU urging citizens to use
cryptography because of ECHELON?
Chris Caldwell
Information Systems Coordinator, Enterprise Systems
Information Systems and Services, The George Washington University
caldwell@gwu.edu | +1 202.994.4674 (w) | +1 202.409.0878 (c)
http://hippocrates.tops.gwu.edu | GPG key ID: 0xE52D0BE8
--
"Programming today is a race between software engineers
striving to build bigger and better idiot-proof programs
and the universe trying to produce bigger and better idiots.
So far, the universe is winning."
- Richard Cook
On Thu, 10 Oct 2002, Marcel Weber wrote:
> I think he meant France with the limitation of 56 bit encription.
>
> Marcel
>
> --------------------
>
> PGP / GPG Key: http://www.ncpro.com/GPG/mmweber-at-ncpro-com.asc
>
> > -----Ursprungliche Nachricht-----
> > Von: Javier Fernandez-Sanguino Pena [mailto:jfs@computer.org]
> > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 10. Oktober 2002 15:24
> > An: Chris Caldwell
> > Cc: Debian Security
> > Betreff: Re: export problems on security updates?
> >
> >
> > >
> > > What might concern you is Spanish law regarding the use/import of
> > > cryptography.
> > >
> > Which law might that be? Last I checked there was none.
> >
> > Javi
> >
> >
> > --
> > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-security-request@lists.debian.org
> > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
> > listmaster@lists.debian.org
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-security-request@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE9pYsa1YKAfuUtC+gRAui8AKDZGj4YiyhJ9V7akgh5a4NCpFrK0QCfT/FM
exobQ9+iK7uwu79Pc7qYK94=
=grGq
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: