Re: Debian (Unstable) problem with SSH and PAM
hehehe well.. builds are slow when you own a slow machine... else...
well... there is not *valid* reason to use mdk rh debian or kind of
"rpm" or "deb" dist.
Have a nice day.
On Thu, 2002-10-03 at 12:01, Statu Nascendi wrote:
> yeah right, like all of us have time to waste on compiling a distrib from
> a-z.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "_ArKiTeKt0_" <bloodkiller@prodigy.net.mx>
> To: <ivo@o2w.nl>
> Cc: <debian-security@lists.debian.org>
> Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 6:51 AM
> Subject: Re: Debian (Unstable) problem with SSH and PAM
>
>
> > Dont worry Ivo, debian's users are always dorks and lame people who
> > doesnt know even how to install a simple package (poor than those rpm..)
> >
> > A tip:
> >
> > Put debian's cd in trashcan and buy windows xp xDDDDDDDD or you can do
> > other thing... more bether...
> >
> > Download linux Gentoo. and learn how to do the things GOOD, not like
> > redhat, debian, or mandrake...
> >
> > Have a nice day
> >
> > On Thu, 2002-10-03 at 09:57, Ivo Timmermans wrote:
> > > Mukundan Sudarsan wrote:
> > > > I have openssh 3.4p1-2 and libpam-module 0.75-1. For
> > > > some reason my sshd never accepts external
> > > > connections... The auth.log file shows my
> > > > pam_limits.so file has an error in dl_open
> > >
> > > Have you been installing stuff from experimental again?
> > >
> > > See bug #162175.
> > >
> > >
> > > Ivo
> > >
> > > --
> > > Poak poak, I'm a pengaru!
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-security-request@lists.debian.org
> > > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
> listmaster@lists.debian.org
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-security-request@lists.debian.org
> > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
> listmaster@lists.debian.org
> >
>
>
--
Here is a tip for those...
Who always are calling lamer to all...
Only because you have linux...
But. If you still being kind of windows user...
then dont callme lamer..
Just because you are one..
Reply to: