Re: Attachment handling in Mutt

[Patrick Maheral <pmaheral@AAI.ca>]

Hi Sylvain,

I should have looked a little closer at _ALL_ of the headers.  I missed
the "alternative" part.  I just thought it was strange that an exe was
"hidden" from view.  I was worried that openning the attachment might
open the "wrong" one, however, i rarely open attachments anyway.

Thanks,
Patrick

On Thu, Aug 08, 2002 at 06:11:31PM +0200, Sylvain Soliman wrote:
>   Usually mutt DOES list all attachments of a multipart message, however if it
> is a "multipart/alternative" then of course it only displays one of the
> alternatives (isn't that your case?). The choice of which alternative is shown
> is made with the use of the alternative_order variable, but I don't know of any
> way to force the display of ALL alternatives.
> 
>   However, I'm not sure what kind of risk there is in not showing an
> attachment...