Le Monday 03 June 2002 à 23:01:39 +0200, Jacques Lav!gnotte a écrit: > On Mon, Jun 03, 2002 at 04:46:36PM -0400, James wrote: > > Are you sure they are open and nmap isn't just returning a false > > positive? > > > > Try a #netstat -vatn on the local server and see if those ports really > > are open. > > Nmap issued from the host itself does not returns anything either... > > news:~# nmap -sU -p 1996-1997 news.pcl.fr > > Starting nmap V. 2.54BETA33 ( www.insecure.org/nmap/ ) > All 2 scanned ports on news.pcl.fr (195.6.210.99) are: closed I have the same : alibaba:~# nmap -sU -p 1996-1997 news.pcl.fr Starting nmap V. 2.54BETA31 ( www.insecure.org/nmap/ ) All 2 scanned ports on news.pcl.fr (195.6.210.99) are: closed Nmap run completed -- 1 IP address (1 host up) scanned in 3 seconds But if I add -v I got : alibaba:~# nmap -v -sU -p 1996-1997 news.pcl.fr Starting nmap V. 2.54BETA31 ( www.insecure.org/nmap/ ) Host news.pcl.fr (195.6.210.99) appears to be up ... good. Initiating UDP Scan against news.pcl.fr (195.6.210.99) The UDP Scan took 1 second to scan 2 ports. Adding open port 1997/udp Adding open port 1996/udp Interesting ports on news.pcl.fr (195.6.210.99): Port State Service 1996/udp open tr-rsrb-port 1997/udp open gdp-port Nmap run completed -- 1 IP address (1 host up) scanned in 1 second Strange isn't it ? -- Loïc
Attachment:
pgpCRSi9cEx9o.pgp
Description: PGP signature