Re: possible hole in mozilla et al
Previously Raymond Wood wrote:
>but I would really like to see either:
> a) woody receiving security patches as soon as sid and potato;
> or
> b) no woody.
>From a security viewpoint b) is the only option, and we have always said
so.
Wichert.
--
_________________________________________________________________
/wichert@wiggy.net This space intentionally left occupied \
| wichert@deephackmode.org http://www.liacs.nl/~wichert/ |
| 1024D/2FA3BC2D 576E 100B 518D 2F16 36B0 2805 3CB8 9250 2FA3 BC2D |
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-security-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: