Am Die, 2002-12-17 um 11.00 schrieb Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder: > On Tue, 2002-12-17 at 00:06, Kilian CAVALOTTI wrote: > > I'll start to point these things out cause I'm wondering if it's certain > MUA combinations that always fail: > > gpg: armor header: Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (MingW32) - GPGrelay v0.90 > gpg: Signature made Tue Dec 17 00:06:47 2002 CET using DSA key ID D657340C > gpg: armor header: Version: 5.0 > gpg: armor header: Comment: PGP Key Server 0.9.4+patch2+JHpatch2 > gpg: pub 1024D/D657340C 2001-10-15 Kilian CAVALOTTI (Kick) <kilian.cavalotti@crans.org> > gpg: key D657340C: public key "Kilian CAVALOTTI (Kick) <kilian.cavalotti@crans.org>" imported > gpg: Total number processed: 1 > gpg: imported: 1 > gpg: BAD signature from "Kilian CAVALOTTI (Kick) <kilian.cavalotti@crans.org>" > > This is evolution 1.2.0-2 and gnupg 1.2.1-2 on my end. MSOE > 6.00.2800.1123at your end. This is Evolution 1.2.1 / GPG 1.0.6 And i can't verify Kilians mail, too. IIRC OE is using a non-standard way to attach the sig. That's the reason Evo is failing to verify the sig. -- Matthias Hentges [www.hentges.net] -> PGP + HTML are welcome ICQ: 97 26 97 4 -> No files, no URLs My OS: Debian Woody: Geek by Nature, Linux by Choice
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil