[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bad Signature (was: Re: SSH)

Am Die, 2002-12-17 um 11.00 schrieb Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von
> On Tue, 2002-12-17 at 00:06, Kilian CAVALOTTI wrote:
> I'll start to point these things out cause I'm wondering if it's certain
> MUA combinations that always fail:
> gpg: armor header: Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (MingW32) - GPGrelay v0.90
> gpg: Signature made Tue Dec 17 00:06:47 2002 CET using DSA key ID D657340C
> gpg: armor header: Version: 5.0
> gpg: armor header: Comment: PGP Key Server 0.9.4+patch2+JHpatch2
> gpg: pub  1024D/D657340C 2001-10-15   Kilian CAVALOTTI (Kick) <kilian.cavalotti@crans.org>
> gpg: key D657340C: public key "Kilian CAVALOTTI (Kick) <kilian.cavalotti@crans.org>" imported
> gpg: Total number processed: 1
> gpg:               imported: 1
> gpg: BAD signature from "Kilian CAVALOTTI (Kick) <kilian.cavalotti@crans.org>"
> This is evolution 1.2.0-2 and gnupg 1.2.1-2 on my end. MSOE
> 6.00.2800.1123at your end.

This is Evolution 1.2.1 / GPG 1.0.6

And i can't verify Kilians mail, too.

IIRC OE is using a non-standard way to attach the sig. That's the reason
Evo is failing to verify the sig.

Matthias Hentges
[www.hentges.net] -> PGP + HTML are welcome
ICQ: 97 26 97 4   -> No files, no URLs

My OS: Debian Woody: Geek by Nature, Linux by Choice

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil

Reply to: