Re: security.debian.org vs stable-proposed-updates

To: Aurelio Turco <azt@bom.gov.au>
Cc: debian-security@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: security.debian.org vs stable-proposed-updates
From: Wichert Akkerman <wichert@wiggy.net>
Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2002 11:45:22 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 20020807094522.GF30407@wiggy.net>
Mail-followup-to: Aurelio Turco <azt@bom.gov.au>, debian-security@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 3D50A484.6FF9EAB7@bom.gov.au>
References: <[🔎] 3D50A484.6FF9EAB7@bom.gov.au>

Previously Aurelio Turco wrote:
> Suppose a major functional bug is discovered
> in a package, one that is not technically a
> security bug but still one that can result
> in a serious loss of data. Will the fix be
> uploaded to security.debian.org or to the
> stable-proposed-updates on mirrors?

stable-proposed-updates

Wichert.

-- 
  _________________________________________________________________
 /wichert@wiggy.net         This space intentionally left occupied \
| wichert@deephackmode.org                    http://www.wiggy.net/ |
| 1024D/2FA3BC2D 576E 100B 518D 2F16 36B0  2805 3CB8 9250 2FA3 BC2D |

Reply to:

References:
- security.debian.org vs stable-proposed-updates
  - From: Aurelio Turco <azt@bom.gov.au>

Prev by Date: security.debian.org vs stable-proposed-updates
Next by Date: Problems using the grsecurity kernel source patch package in woody.
Previous by thread: security.debian.org vs stable-proposed-updates
Next by thread: Problems using the grsecurity kernel source patch package in woody.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread