[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Uh-oh. Cracked allready. I think...

>>>>> "John" == John  <john@keimel.com> writes:

John> Woody.... ahh woody. It's always been told to me (by someone who's
John> even on this list and on the debian security team) that 'Potato'
John> should be the only thing that's really trusted ("trusted") for
John> security in Debian.  It's supposed to get security updates
John> first. Arguments of the debian release system aside, that's the
John> general plan of debian it seems. You shouldn't have used woody for
John> a remote box.

Security patches go into stable first.  Sid/unstable is generally
upgraded pretty promptly too.  They're working on a system (AFAIK) to
allow security patches to be fast tracked into testing.


>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (OSF1) Comment:
>> For info see http://www.gnupg.org
>> iD8DBQE87QV/lE/Gp2pqC7wRAnOwAKClkxaNInxG+/59Z+67CmyY6vzJyQCgmHl5
>> dXGHMoenwxKHE2bQZQWI308= =VSU4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

John> Oh, and you'll want to revoke your PGP key if it was on this box,
John> as you can't trust your PGP keys anymore either.

Unless it was password protected.  (With a secure password.)

Hubert Chan <hubert@uhoreg.ca> - http://www.uhoreg.ca/
PGP/GnuPG key: 1024D/124B61FA
Fingerprint: 96C5 012F 5F74 A5F7 1FF7  5291 AF29 C719 124B 61FA
Key available at wwwkeys.pgp.net.   Encrypted e-mail preferred.

Attachment: pgpsAPKWvzfoz.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: