[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

cfingerd bugs [Re: Secure Finger Daemon]

Wichert Akkerman <wichert@wiggy.net> writes:

> Previously eim wrote:
> > Which Finger daemon is *really* secure ?
> I haven't looked at all of them, but cfingerd most certainly is not.

I notice the security-related bug reports against cfingerd
are all marked 'normal' -- shouldn't they be 'critical' ?

I know nothing in detail about [c]fingerd.

Reply to: