also sprach P Prince <princep@charter.net> [2001.12.30.1846 +0100]: > The eaisest and most failsafe way to secure bind is to install djbdns. you are kidding me, right? the question was how to secure bind. the asker wasn't in need of other religious beliefs. while i strongly believe that djb is a real pain and a man with many problems, his software is good. despite the license. and despite the configuration. qmail or djbdns, i find configuring postfix and bind9 to be a lot more straight forward than using djb's paradigm of touched files... but more importantly, if the question was how to secure bind, then let's not secure it by substituting... bind is still the #1 nameserver, and a thread like this (even though argued a million times) can be quite informative. -- martin; (greetings from the heart of the sun.) \____ echo mailto: !#^."<*>"|tr "<*> mailto:"; net@madduck -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- Version: 3.12 GCS/IT d- s: a-- C++(++++) UL+++(++++) P+ L+++ E--- W- N+ o? K? !w O- M- V PS+(+++) PE-- Y+ PGP++ t- !5 !X R-(+) !tv b+(++) DI--(++) D++(+++) G(++) e>++ h* r+>++ :) y+++++>+(++) ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
Attachment:
pgptLOvHOom97.pgp
Description: PGP signature