[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Hi :>



Please let me know also,
because I have been getting empty messages from root too



On Thu, 18 Oct 2001, Tom Breza wrote:

>Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2001 19:46:01 +0100 (BST)
>From: Tom Breza <tom@PCService-NET.co.uk>
>To: debian-security@lists.debian.org
>Subject: Hi :>
>Resent-From: debian-security@lists.debian.org
>
>
>Hi I got this today in my mail box, this is generated by somthing but I
>don't know what is it? Why I got message from root? and why is empty?
>also is strage a X-UIDL,
>what can generate that kind of mail and why is empty?
>
>Tom
>
>Type Bits/KeyID    Date       User ID
>pub  1024/0B22D0E1 2001/09/23 Tom Breza <Tom@PCService-NET.co.uk>
>
>-----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
>Version: 2.6.3ia
>
>mQCNAzuuMNoAAAEEAOa8EvOztpYuHXxwb/NZVjDmXbutOK6wqF29SAnoXkiHB0ta
>fGrNgcPPJoryN+291o4nxMWE2fCYNuArS8+0m9zMA5829QV2lSkkbrRXR2LLVYc4
>1bpubOom2DD2Qi+kHHYEFHdczavFxfGeQgbDCceF7uM3G5lGMxGsydsLItDhAAUR
>tCNUb20gQnJlemEgPFRvbUBQQ1NlcnZpY2UtTkVULmNvLnVrPokAlQMFEDuuMNoR
>rMnbCyLQ4QEBMA4EALUdA5IKzjSNVlVtRbpuuhZc4pf1qJuDn0bdSIg9vPmadXNS
>uoqZn5UY8inYgx06y2RwsAf2o7ncyC33mf7cmcQ3Z6g9mfvHXPC+azfbb+RLc5be
>pE3qYm1zvfQzzFT+Z4U1YvuNNfmASBsANo1ulR3rAYqKKtBMkwC1hFEysXlN
>=dZ9o
>-----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
>
>---------- Forwarded message ----------
>Envelope-to: tom@localhost
>Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1])
>	by laptop with esmtp (Exim 3.32 #1 (Debian))
>	id 15u6Et-0003cm-01
>	for <tom@localhost>; Thu, 18 Oct 2001 07:01:07 +0100
>Received: from 192.168.253.254 [192.168.253.254]
>	by localhost with POP3 (fetchmail-5.9.0)
>	for tom@localhost (single-drop); Thu, 18 Oct 2001 07:01:07 +0100 (BST)
>Received: from root by router with local (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian))
>	id 15u5g1-0000JF-00
>	for <tom@PCService-NET.co.uk>; Thu, 18 Oct 2001 06:25:05 +0100
>Message-Id: <E15u5g1-0000JF-00@router>
>From: root <root@PCService-NET.co.uk>
>To: tom@PCService-NET.co.uk
>Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2001 06:25:05 +0100
>X-UIDL: iX2"!]6*!!\]2!!UV/"!
>
>
>
>
>



Reply to: