Re: Re: Apt-get is insecure

To: debian-security@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Re: Apt-get is insecure
From: Wichert Akkerman <wichert@wiggy.net>
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2001 17:06:58 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 20011213160658.GZ14968@wiggy.net>
Mail-followup-to: debian-security@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 200112131601.fBDG1L7m019445@wapwas2.cytanet.com.cy>
References: <[🔎] 873d2f2kdf.fsf@puck.erasmus.jurri.net> <[🔎] 20011213172418.A25716@karjala.org> <[🔎] 20011213152447.GV14968@wiggy.net> <[🔎] 877krr2ks9.fsf@puck.erasmus.jurri.net> <[🔎] 20011213154600.GA29713@atoom.net> <[🔎] 200112131601.fBDG1L7m019445@wapwas2.cytanet.com.cy>

Previously ralphtheraccoon wrote:
> There isn't a "stable" debsig-verify or other package...
> does this mean that "stable" is less secure than "unstable"?

Neither actually, the debsig infrastructure isn't use currently

Wichert.

-- 
  _________________________________________________________________
 /wichert@wiggy.net         This space intentionally left occupied \
| wichert@deephackmode.org            http://www.liacs.nl/~wichert/ |
| 1024D/2FA3BC2D 576E 100B 518D 2F16 36B0  2805 3CB8 9250 2FA3 BC2D |

Reply to:

References:
- Re: Apt-get is insecure
  - From: Samuli Suonpaa <suonpaa@iki.fi>
- Apt-get is insecure
  - From: Alexander Karelas <karjala_lists@yahoo.co.uk>
- Re: Apt-get is insecure
  - From: Wichert Akkerman <wichert@wiggy.net>
- Re: Apt-get is insecure
  - From: Samuli Suonpaa <suonpaa@iki.fi>
- Re: Apt-get is insecure
  - From: Miek Gieben <miekg@atoom.net>
- Re: Re: Apt-get is insecure
  - From: ralphtheraccoon <ralphtheraccoon@uk2.net>

Prev by Date: Re: Re: Apt-get is insecure
Next by Date: Re: Apt-get is insecure
Previous by thread: Re: Re: Apt-get is insecure
Next by thread: Re: Apt-get is insecure
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread