Re: Questions regarding the Security Secretary Position
On Mon, Oct 22, 2001 at 08:23:24AM -0600, John Galt wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Oct 2001, Colin Phipps wrote:
> >The "barriers" to becoming a developer are mainly commitment to the
> >project and to the social contract, both of which should be
> >requirements for any security secretary. It doesn't imply package
> >maintenance (IIRC).
> Actually, it does.
No. *Most* developers maintain packages, sure, but they don't have to.
http://nm.debian.org/newnm.html (I think that's the URL, I'm looking at
it in CVS because pandora seems inaccessible):
If you intend to package software, do you have a Debian package you
have adopted or created ready to show your AM? And if you intend to
do other things (e.g. port Debian to other architectures, help with
documentation, Quality Assurance or Security), do you have experience
in those things which you can tell your AM about?
Colin Watson [firstname.lastname@example.org]