On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 11:01:10AM +0200, Johan Segernäs wrote: > And no, i wouldn't use woody on a firewall, it's to many packet-updates all > the time, takes > to much time to keep track of everything imho. woody also does not get security updates, in fact it can take a very long time for security related updates to get into woody since its almost entirely managed by a script. unstable simply gets new versions of a package installed immediatly so any security fixes are in unstable as soon as they are packaged. that does NOT guarentee they will make it into woody any time soon though. the `testing' distribution (now woody) is the least secure branch you can run. -- Ethan Benson http://www.alaska.net/~erbenson/
Attachment:
pgpsAgrSYKneM.pgp
Description: PGP signature