On Wed, 26 Jan 2022 10:10:04 +0100 Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> wrote: > Hi Neil, > > I think, if there are no objections from other, that we can look > forward into merging the grab-cve-fixes and merge-cve-list updates. https://salsa.debian.org/security-tracker-team/security-tracker/-/merge_requests/100 I haven't set a reviewer or assignee for the MR. > While testing there was one minor glitch which might be checked later > if we want to have it fixed, please double check if my claim is > correct. If a list to be merged contains a listing of a reserved CVE, > say something like > > CVE [temporary description] > RESERVED > - source fixedversion > NOTE: note > > then merge-cve-list will stumple over the RESERVED keyword. Bu this > can easily be workrounded by cleaning up the list one want to merge by > the RESERVED keywords. I can look at that as an extension of the existing bug report, I've also got the REJECTED support to add to update-vuln for Moritz. > Maybe you can put both in a MR and give others say until end of week > time to object on both scripts updates and then go ahead with the > merging. > > I have not looked at the third script (update-vuln), I had so far > little usecases to directly work with it. > > Regards and thanks a lot for your work on this part as well. > Salvatore -- Neil Williams ============= https://linux.codehelp.co.uk/
Attachment:
pgpKDFE49VkX_.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature