[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#773842: marked as done (security-tracker: DSA-3110-1 vs. tracker)



Your message dated Wed, 24 Dec 2014 07:30:02 +0100
with message-id <20141224063002.GA2008@lorien.valinor.li>
and subject line Re: Bug#773842: security-tracker: DSA-3110-1 vs. tracker
has caused the Debian Bug report #773842,
regarding security-tracker: DSA-3110-1 vs. tracker
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
773842: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=773842
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: security-tracker
Severity: normal

Hello.

Another DSA [1] seems to lack an epoch in the stable fixed version.
The tracker data [2] should be fixed.

[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-security-announce/2014/msg00303.html
[2] https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/DSA-3110-1

P.S.: This kind of issues with DSAs lacking epochs seems to be really
      frequent: I think the DSA authors should be asked to always
      include the correct epoch in the mentioned versions!
      What do you think?
      

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi Francesco,

On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 10:57:09PM +0100, Francesco Poli (wintermute) wrote:
> Package: security-tracker
> Severity: normal
> 
> Hello.
> 
> Another DSA [1] seems to lack an epoch in the stable fixed version.
> The tracker data [2] should be fixed.
> 
> [1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-security-announce/2014/msg00303.html
> [2] https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/DSA-3110-1
> 
> P.S.: This kind of issues with DSAs lacking epochs seems to be really
>       frequent: I think the DSA authors should be asked to always
>       include the correct epoch in the mentioned versions!
>       What do you think?

Thank you I have corrected the tracker information. Since the epoch is
part of the package version, it clearly should be included. The recent
cases were I think simply overlooking/human error (which can happen)
on DSA writers side. Let's see that we manage that this does not
happen too often.

Thanks for your overall work always checking the issues! Really
appreciated.

Regards,
Salvatore

--- End Message ---

Reply to: