Hi, On Montag, 22. September 2014, Christoph Biedl wrote: > While the new appearence of the security tracker is a *huge* > improvemnt, both in information details and design, thanks for that, thanks! > As a suggestion for the above issue: > > + squeeze, squeeze (security) 5.04-5+squeeze5 [gray]No longer supported¹ > | squeeze (lts) 5.04-5+squeeze7 [green]fixed > + wheezy 5.11-2+deb7u3 [light red]fix pending² > | wheezy (security) 5.11-2+deb7u5 [green]fixed > | jessie, sid 1:5.19-2 [green]fixed I like the idea of using more colors... > + ¹ The squeeze suite has been discontinued. Use the "squeeze-lts" version That's (slightly) misleading and wrong, though. > + ² Will be handled in due course. Use the "wheezy (security)" version > The footnotes are part of the text. And yes, they'd have to appear > on every page. > Your opinion on that? yes, true, the security tracker still has some bugs which need to be fixed. Specific suggestions (like colors or footnotes) are best suggested in seperate short bugs, yet best with patches :-) That said, I don't agree with the described urgency / panic. Debian might look bad because of bad things we do or good things we dont do, but seldomly because our security tracker is too accurate (or even inaccurate/wrong at times) :-) cheers, Holger
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.