On Wed, 23 Jul 2014 15:51:35 +0200 Holger Levsen wrote: [...] > Hi, Hi Holger! > > looking at > https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/status/release/oldstable > (unstable too) it seems to > me the urgency field is rather unused, for oldstable all entries are either > low or "not yet assigned" (unstable has one high urgency entry, while way more > in reality), so I'd like to propose to remove this field completly as it's > confusing and irrelevant. Well, I don't know whether it is indeed unused. To be honest, I was hoping it was used and filled with relevant values whenever possible! If this is not the case, I would encourage the security tracker users to set this field with significant values, so that readers may get an approximate idea about the gravity of the various vulnerabilities... -- http://www.inventati.org/frx/ fsck is a four letter word... ..................................................... Francesco Poli . GnuPG key fpr == CA01 1147 9CD2 EFDF FB82 3925 3E1C 27E1 1F69 BFFE
Attachment:
pgpA5tO_DmNHT.pgp
Description: PGP signature