[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#651603: marked as done (security-tracker: DSA-2362-1 vs. tracker)



Your message dated Thu, 15 Dec 2011 18:39:51 -0500
with message-id <CANTw=MNGH5CSR1y2r5qH4WqLxsuPY3-giEG=qPb-DO4D=baWmA@mail.gmail.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#651603: security-tracker: DSA-2362-1 vs. tracker
has caused the Debian Bug report #651603,
regarding security-tracker: DSA-2362-1 vs. tracker
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
651603: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=651603
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: security-tracker
Severity: normal

Hi all!
It seems to me that the tracker page [1] for DSA-2362-1 [2] misses
the epoch in the squeeze fixed version (which should be 1:2.0.7-1squeeze3
rather than 2.0.7-1squeeze3).

Moreover, the DSA [2] says that CVE-2011-2777 does not affect oldstable,
but the tracker [3] seems to disagree.

Please fix these inconsistencies.
Thanks for your time!

[1] http://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/DSA-2362-1
[2] http://lists.debian.org/debian-security-announce/2011/msg00240.html
[3] http://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2011-2777



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
>> Moreover, the DSA [2] says that CVE-2011-2777 does not affect oldstable,
>> but the tracker [3] seems to disagree.
>
> This second issue seems to still hold, though.

fixed, thanks.


--- End Message ---

Reply to: