[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#652590: marked as done (security-tracker: DSA-2364-1 vs. tracker)

Your message dated Mon, 19 Dec 2011 19:20:14 +0100
with message-id <20111219192014.4e15e4133d9234eabac7d8fc@paranoici.org>
and subject line Re: security-tracker: DSA-2364-1 vs. tracker
has caused the Debian Bug report #652590,
regarding security-tracker: DSA-2364-1 vs. tracker
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
652590: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=652590
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: security-tracker
Severity: normal

Hi!

It seems to me that the tracker page [1] for DSA-2364-1 [2] misses
the epoch in the squeeze fixed version (that should be
1:7.5+8+squeeze1, rather than 7.5+8+squeeze1).

Please fix the tracker data.
Thanks for your time!

Actually, the epoch seems to be also missing from the DSA [2] itself,
but there's probably not much that can be done now to fix that...

[1] http://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/DSA-2364-1
[2] http://lists.debian.org/debian-security-announce/2011/msg00242.html

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On Mon, 19 Dec 2011 00:07:51 +0100 Francesco Poli (wintermute) wrote:

[...]
> It seems to me that the tracker page [1] for DSA-2364-1 [2] misses
> the epoch in the squeeze fixed version (that should be
> 1:7.5+8+squeeze1, rather than 7.5+8+squeeze1).
> 
> Please fix the tracker data.
[...]

It seems to me that the incorrect tracker data have been fixed.
I am happy to see that bugs I report get fixed: thanks!  :-)

I would be even happier, if the corresponding bug reports were closed,
so that I would be notified...  ;-)

Anyway, I am closing this report with this message.
Bye.

> [1] http://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/DSA-2364-1
> [2] http://lists.debian.org/debian-security-announce/2011/msg00242.html


-- 
 http://www.inventati.org/frx/frx-gpg-key-transition-2010.txt
 New GnuPG key, see the transition document!
..................................................... Francesco Poli .
 GnuPG key fpr == CA01 1147 9CD2 EFDF FB82  3925 3E1C 27E1 1F69 BFFE

Attachment: pgpVFBo6zYNXI.pgp
Description: PGP signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: