[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: DSA-2254-1 vs. tracker



On Sat, 4 Jun 2011 16:25:38 -0400 Michael Gilbert wrote:

> Francesco Poli wrote:
> 
> > Hello,
> > while looking at DSA-2254-1 [1], I noticed that the CVE-2011-1760
> > tracker page [2] does not list oprofile versions for wheezy or sid.
> > Maybe it's because the fixed version info for "(unstable)" is referred
> > to the non-existent source package "opcontrol"?
> > 
> > [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-security-announce/2011/msg00124.html
> > [2] http://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2011-1760
> 
> fixed.

Perfect! Thanks a lot.

> you can see in [2] that the source package name was entered
> incorrectly as opcontrol instead of oprofile.

Yes, that's exactly what I was suspecting (as I said).
Thanks for confirming.

Bye.

-- 
 http://www.inventati.org/frx/frx-gpg-key-transition-2010.txt
 New GnuPG key, see the transition document!
..................................................... Francesco Poli .
 GnuPG key fpr == CA01 1147 9CD2 EFDF FB82  3925 3E1C 27E1 1F69 BFFE

Attachment: pgpWPQ8PDt9oe.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: