Re: Squeeze release vs. tracker
On Thu, February 10, 2011 03:40, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> On Wed, 9 Feb 2011 22:12:21 +0100 Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
>
>> On Wed, February 9, 2011 19:50, Francesco Poli wrote:
>> > On the other hand, the security tracker seems to still think that
>> lenny
>> > is stable [1] and squeeze is testing [2], while I have been unable to
>> > find any traces of wheezy...
>> >
>> > Is there something that should be done manually, in order to let the
>> > tracker realize that squeeze is out?
>> > Is there any event that should happen before this can be done?
>>
>> I've changed the code right after squeeze's release. I've also restarted
>> the tracker service. Apparently this is not enough - Florian, can you
>> help?
>
> The Makefile also needs to change since that is used to download the
> release files that are parsed for package version info.
Thanks, so that's what I've overlooked. I changed it now but (famous last
words) I need to leave soon so I hope it didn't break too much. On the
other hand, the tracker didn't work for wheezy now anyway.
I skipped the volatile part as that has completely changed for squeeze so
if someone wants to put the correct urls in there be my guest.
Cheers,
Thijs
Reply to: