Re: A new ambiguity
* Michael Gilbert:
> this has actually come up every now and then, and we have just had to
> accept the wrongness. i was actually planning to implement the above
> solution at some point, but hadn't found the time. i don't think the
> additional repetition is too burdensome since the CVE info is (usually)
> automatically filled in by the dsa2list script.
Good to know, thanks for the feedback. I have implemented that in
r14666 (I hope). It's really easy to do such things in the Python
code (at least compared to the SQL version).
Reply to: