Re: Refactoring the tracker
* Michael Gilbert:
> Along with Raphael's suggestion, perhaps during updates we could
> load the new dictionaries into memory concurrently with the old
> ones. Then we could compare the two and only act on items that
> actually have differences before pushing the new updates.
As long as things fit into memory, I think it's cheaper to recompute
everything. The additional bookkeeping for dependency tracking will
kill any performance advantage, and a manual incremental algorithm is
just too error-prone, IMHO.
Reply to: