On Tue, 7 Jul 2009 15:44:23 -0400 Michael S. Gilbert wrote: [...] > by all means, go ahead and file the bugs; Bugs filed: #536147 and #536148 > just make sure that the > consequences are serious or greater before filing as RC. I think that *introducing* (that is to say, as a regression) a security hole that allows a denial of service attack (crash) and/or a privilege escalation attack *does* have serious consequences. > there is some > new relevant discussion on -devel [1] indicating intent get the > unstable kernel moving into testing soon (primarily to move d-i > development forward). I was kinda suspecting that this was the case... Call it intuition, call it sixth sense, call it as you like... ;-) -- New location for my website! Update your bookmarks! http://www.inventati.org/frx ..................................................... Francesco Poli . GnuPG key fpr == C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12 31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4
Attachment:
pgpgvHFPiltkJ.pgp
Description: PGP signature