Hi, * Moritz Muehlenhoff <jmm@inutil.org> [2009-03-11 01:57]: > On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 01:58:04PM +0000, nion@alioth.debian.org wrote: > > Author: nion > > Date: 2009-03-10 13:58:03 +0000 (Tue, 10 Mar 2009) > > New Revision: 11367 > > > > Modified: > > data/CVE/list > > data/spu-candidates.txt > > Log: > > - spu notifications > > We should likely re-organise to ospu-candidates and spu-candidates > to avoid confusion for maintainers and better tracking? Yes I agree. Do you have any better idea apart from using two files? Cheers Nico -- Nico Golde - http://www.ngolde.de - nion@jabber.ccc.de - GPG: 0x73647CFF For security reasons, all text in this mail is double-rot13 encrypted.
Attachment:
pgplaROZFdInj.pgp
Description: PGP signature